Legal Opinion

Saab Automobile AB v. General Motors Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 24, 2014No. 13-1899PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

•SILER, Circuit Judge.

Saab Automobile AB (“Saab”) and its parent company, Spyker N.V. (“Spyker”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), sued General Motors Company (“GM”) for tortious interference with economic expectancy under Michigan law, claiming that GM made public statements that caused a transaction between Saab and a Chinese investor to fall through, thereby driving Saab into bankruptcy. The district court granted GM’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, finding that Plaintiffs failed as a matter of law to establish a valid business expectancy and intentional interference by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Rasheed v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Clifton Jackson v. Sedgwick Claims Management Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Andrea Perry v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Atlas Technologies, LLC v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  3. Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. NOCSAECourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  4. Watkins v. Honeywell International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. DAGS II, LLC v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API