Legal Opinion
Watkins v. Honeywell International Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2017No. 17-3032PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Chief Judge.
This is a too-familiar story. For almost 40 years, Honeywell International (or its predecessors) operated a manufacturing plant in Fostoria, Ohio. Many union workers, including Ann Watkins and James Ul-icny, spent most of their working years at the plant. They retired at a time when Honeywell promised in a collective-bargaining, agreement that it would pay for their health insurance. But Honeywell’s plans for Fostoria changed. When the final agreement expired in.. 2011, Honeywell did not renew it. It sold the plant. and, later, stopped paying for its retirees’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- John Gallo v. Moen IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Noe v. PolyOne Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Pabst Brewing Company, Inc. v. Jack S. CorraoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rebecca Cooper v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Barbara Fletcher v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 7 v. Pro Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- In re ASPC Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Amos v. PPG Industries IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.