Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 23, 1975No. Nos. 2007-C and 2008-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

Defendant, convicted of burglary in the first degree, appeals, asserting that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a warrant search of defendant’s father’s home (hereafter the Garza residence).

The warrant was issued pursuant to an affidavit sworn to by an Ontario police detective. Defendant first contends the facts stated in the affidavit do not represent probable cause to believe stolen items were in the Garza residence at the time the warrant issued. We limit our inquiry to probable cause to the four corners of the affidavit. State v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AshkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API