Legal Opinion

Torres v. Grant

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1957No. 6267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus in which we are asked to issue a peremptory writ directing respondent to honor and pay a certain warrant drawn on him and payable to petitioner, .or show why he had not done so. The State Auditor, J. D. Hannah, had previously issued to petitioner a warrant drawn on respondent in payment of services. On presentation of the warrant, the respondent refused to honor it, assigning as a reason therefor the -force of Chapter 252, Laws 1957, which provides that warrants on state funds may be drawn only by the Director of the Department of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shute v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Clancy v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. DavidsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Cort v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Red River Valley Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Legislative Audit CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Preece v. RamptonUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Preece v. RamptonUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Preece v. RamptonUtah Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API