Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Red River Valley Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1935No. 4161PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
This cause is before us on motion for rehearing which has been duly considered and is denied. We remain convinced of the correctness of the conclusion reached in our former opinion, but further consideration satisfies us that the question, which counsel on both sides seemed to agree was the decisive one, is not so. This will eliminate some of the reasoning of the former opinion. Hence, it is hereby withdrawn and the one to follow is substituted therefor..The state of New Mexico on the relation of the Interstate Stream Commission filed a petition in the district court of San…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corporation v. WS Ranch CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- W. S. Ranch Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. Kaiser Steel Corporation, a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- New Mexico Municipal League, Inc. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of Sunland Park v. Santa Teresa Services Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- North v. Public Service Co. of New MexicoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.