Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shute v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1939No. Civil No. 4118PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus by G. W. Shute against Ana Frohmiller as state auditor, to compel her to audit and allow his verified claims for salary as attorney for the Colorado River Commission for the period from March 9, 1939, to April 15,1939.

The petition is based on the provisions of chapter 46, Session Laws of the Fourteenth Legislature of the State of Arizona, and certain action taken pursuant thereto. That act creates the Colorado River Commission consisting of three members to be appointed by the Governor, with the advice and consent of the senate, and confers upon it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Hillis v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Murphy v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Manchin v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Giss v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1957

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API