Thompson v. Legislative Audit Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMODY, Justice.
In this original mandamus proceeding, the State Auditor challenges the validity of ch. 287, Sess.L.1965 (§§ 4-24-1 to 4-24-25, N.M.S.A.1953).
The New Mexico Constitution, art. V, § 1, designates the executive officers of the State, and specifically includes the “state auditor”; however, it is silent with respect to any duties of that office. Two sections of the statute point up the controversy. Sec. 4 — 24—23 provides for a transfer from the state auditor to the legislative audit commission of all equipment, supplies, records, and any other property or thing held by him…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Hudson v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Wright v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Chavez v. EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Bogert v. KinzerIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. King v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Romer v. Colorado General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Powers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.