Legal Opinion

Thorpe v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 7, 1930No. 4265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

This is an action at law for damages for infringement of an expired patent. It is being defended by the vendor of the article in question, a child’s cap; and I shall refer to the vendor as the defendant. The defendant has moved to dismiss on the ground of “laches,” and, in support of the motion, has filed affidavits. No counter affidavits have been filed, and I understand that the essential facts as stated by the defendant are not really in dispute.

Laches is, of course, an equitable defense and in pleading it the defendant avails itself of section 274b of the Judicial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  2. Ward v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Simmons v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Mason v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Sherman v. GalbraithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag SCA Personal Care, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. People of Porto Rico v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
  3. Estate of Thomson v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Banker v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API