Legal Opinion

SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag SCA Personal Care, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 18, 2015No. 2013-1564PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge PROST in which Circuit Judges NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, O’MALLEY, and REYNA join. Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge HUGHES in which Circuit Judges MOORE, WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN join.

*1315PROST, Chief Judge.

We convene en banc to resolve whether, in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1962, 188 L.Ed.2d 979 (2014), laches remains a defense to legal relief in a patent infringement suit. We conclude that Congress codified a laches defense in 35 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. High Point Sarl v. Sprint Nextel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft v. Sirius Xm Radio Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
  5. ART + COM Innovationpool GmbH v. Google Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API