Legal Opinion

Banker v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1933No. 6763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.(1) The patent involved, 1,005,135-, is for an improvement in windshields in relation to hinging the upper and lower sections together, and for the holding of the upper section in a folded position.(2) Arthur L. Banker, the plaintiff, made application for the patent on December 19, 1907, which was granted October 10, 1911, and which expired October 10, 1928. This action was brought October 7, 1931.(3) The defendant, a corporation of the state of Delaware, was incorporated in 1919-. It purchased the assets of the Fórd Motor Company, a Michigan…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Aluminum Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Armstrong v. AVCO Manufacturing Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  3. Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API