Barton v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR to the Circuit Court for Bane County. The plaintiff in error brought this suit to reverse a judgment of the circuit court against him in a criminal action. The ease will appear sufficiently from the opinion. cited 7 Cow. 4Í4, 54; 1 Green (N. J.) 361; 2 Hawks, 98; 1 Rich. 219; 1 Met. 258; 2 id. 413; 12 Ala. 840; 4 Dana, 518; 14 Ind. 327; 10 Humph. 101; 7 Mo. 55; 29 Me. 329; 1 Scam. 172; 17 How. 204-8; 16 Ill. 380; 19 Ohio, 423; 1 Greene (Iowa), 392; Thach. Or.
Read the full summary
ERROR to the Circuit Court for Bane County. The plaintiff in error brought this suit to reverse a judgment of the circuit court against him in a criminal action. The ease will appear sufficiently from the opinion. cited 7 Cow. 4Í4, 54; 1 Green (N. J.) 361; 2 Hawks, 98; 1 Rich. 219; 1 Met. 258; 2 id. 413; 12 Ala. 840; 4 Dana, 518; 14 Ind. 327; 10 Humph. 101; 7 Mo. 55; 29 Me. 329; 1 Scam. 172; 17 How. 204-8; 16 Ill. 380; 19 Ohio, 423; 1 Greene (Iowa), 392; Thach. Or. Cas. 202; 4 Car. & P. 386; 1 Parker, 445, 338,182; 1 Whart. Or. L. § 565, and note “ 5.” 'In forgery, the number of a bill is no…
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
From the statement of facts agreed upon in this case, it appears that the defendant forged five separate drafts for the payment of money, each the same in all respects as the one set out in the copy of the indictment contained in the plea, except that they were numbered respectively 482, 483, 484, 485 and 486; that these drafts were upon the same sheet of paper, being printed blanks, each separate, as is usual in a *589draft-boob; that it was not known at wbat time these forgeries were committed; that tbe defendant uttered all of these drafts at the same time to the Eirst National bank of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BenhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- United States v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Dean v. CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.