Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1902No. Nos. 13,029-(23)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Defendant was convicted in the district court for Blue Earth county, Quinn, J., of forgery in the second degree, the crime consisting in uttering a forged note. From the judgment of conviction defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

On February 5, 1902, in the district court of the county of Blue Earth, two indictments were returned by the grand jury against the defendant. The first one was for forgery in the first degree, by uttering as true a forged mortgage; and the second one was for forgery in. the second degree, by uttering a forged promissory note, which the mortgage purported to secure. He was convicted on the first indictment, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for the term of three years and three months. He appealed from the judgment to this court, which affirmed the conviction. State v. Moore,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BenhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  2. State v. ColgateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. State v. EggleshtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Barton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. State v. FredlundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API