Legal Opinion

Kern v. Henry

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1934No. Civ. No. 1252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In March, 1928, the defendants purchased from the plaintiffs a certain tract of land, the deal being handled through an escrow. The escrow instructions recited that the purchase price of the property was $100,000, payable as follows: $26,000 by the delivery of a deed of trust executed by third parties covering an apartment house in Long Beach, $4,000 by the conveyance of other real property, $500 in cash, and the balance of $69,500 to be secured by a note and deed of trust on the property sold, to be executed by the defendants. In relation to the $26,000 trust deed referred to, the escrow…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conde v. Dreisam Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. Hammond Lumber Co. v. KearsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Kane v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Giant Powder Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Swan v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claussen v. First American Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Diamond v. HaydisArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wolf v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Richardson v. Walter Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Gaetani v. Goss-Golden West Sheet Metal Profit Sharing PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API