Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 12, 2002No. 2000-478-C.APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This ease came before the Court on March 12, 2002, pursuant to an order directing the defendant, Juan Bautista Guzman (defendant or Guzman), to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. Guzman is before the Court on appeal from a Superior Court order that granted in part and denied in part a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Rule 35 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. After hearing arguments of the counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown.…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  2. State v. BallardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. State v. MolliconeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. State v. UphamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  5. State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RuffnerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  2. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. State v. VieiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  4. State v. BARKMEYERSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  5. State v. Chhoy HakSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API