Legal Opinion

Frommert v. Conkright

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 30, 2004No. 00-CV-6311LPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Although adopted for salutary purposes, pension and other employee benefit plans have spawned much litigation over the years, particularly since the adoption of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., in 1974. 1 This case presents one more example.

At issue in this case is the pension plan of Xerox Corporation, The plan called the Retirement Income Guarantee Plan (“RIGP” or “Plan”) has already been the subject of several prior decisions of this Court 2 and other courts. 3

The details of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API