People v. Neel
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
A jury found that, from September 1990 through May 1991, defendant committed nine acts of lewd conduct with his nine-year old daughter. The jury determined that six of the acts, in which the daughter either orally copulated defendant or masturbated his penis with her hand, were accomplished by means of force. On one occasion, with his hand defendant “push[ed] [the victim’s] head down ... on his private.” When the victim “tried to back [her] head up,” defendant “would push it down ’till he made [her] mouth touch his private . . . .” In five incidents, defendant would “hold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PitmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. SchulzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MendiblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. BolanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. Chittra Toon MomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.