People v. Soto
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
The Legislature has made it a crime to commit a lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a).) It has mandated additional penal consequences when the act is committed “by use of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the victim.” (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)(1).) 1 Unlike the crime of rape, there is no requirement that the lewd acts be committed “against the will of the victim.” Indeed, 20 years ago the Legislature specifically deleted language to this effect from the definition of the aggravated…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. CottoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- P. v. Perez CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Jimenez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. BarbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.