People v. Alvarez
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
Appellant Jaime Perez Alvarez here invokes People v. Schulz (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 999 [3 Cal.Rptr.2d 799] to support his argument the crimes he committed were not accomplished by force. We reject the argument and add our voices to what we perceive to be a chorus of disapproval of the Schulz holding.
Appellant was convicted of six counts of forcible lewd conduct on a child under the age of 14 and two counts of aggravated sexual assault arising from such conduct. Upon finding he had suffered two prior “strike” convictions, the trial court sentenced him to an indeterminate life…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. Jimenez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Hicks, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Jacobo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.