Legal Opinion

Whiteside v. New York Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 10, 1972No. 686-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This appeal raises a single question. Does the double indemnity provision of a life insurance policy issued by defendant, New York Life Insurance Company, apply to the death of the insured, Thomas Edward White-side, resulting from a self-injected overdose of methedrine and morphine?

In an extensive and well-reasoned memorandum decision, the trial court ruled that the double indemnity provi sion did not apply, and the action seeking to recover the benefit was dismissed. We agree.

The issue was brought before the trial court by concurrent motions for summary judgment. The following material facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Selective Logging Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Johnson v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lloyd v. First Farwest Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. McKinnon v. Republic National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Rossman v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Floramo v. Monumental Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API