Rossman v. New York Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
There being no genuine issue as to any material fact, the question to be resolved on this appeal is whether defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56 (c), Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff first contends that the substantive law of the State of New York governs this action since both contracts of insurance were completed in the State of New York; however, N. C. G.S. 58-28 declares that “All contracts of insurance on property, lives, or interests in this State shall be deemed to be made therein. . . .” Therefore, since at the time of his death…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fallins v. Durham Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Mills v. State Life and Health Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Whiteside v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marsh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Rink v. VICOF II TrustDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021