Legal Opinion

People's Cable Corp. v. City of Rochester

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Abk, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff, People’s Cable Corporation (herein People’s) and defendant, Cable Television of Rochester, Inc. (herein Cable), were organized pursuant to section 3 of the Transportation Corporations Law to operate a community antenna television (CATV) system.

The plaintiff and others, not parties to this action, applied to the defendant City of Rochester (herein city), for the right to conduct a CATV system within the city. Their applications were denied when the City Council adopted an ordinance (No. 69-597) on December 30, 1969 that granted this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. People Ex Rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Ghee v. . Northern Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Chatlos v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Community Tele-Communications, Inc. v. Heather Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. TCG New York, Inc. v. City of White Plains, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. TC Systems, Inc. v. Town of Colonie, New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  4. People's Cable Corp. v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Cable Television of Rochester, Inc. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API