Legal Opinion

Breeding v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1942No. 8 Div. 170PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Is an employee of Tennessee Valley Authority entitled to the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Alabama, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253, et seq, in case of accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment?

The Tennessee Valley Authority, a corporate governmental agency of the United States, is subject to suit only as granted by act of Congress.

The creative act provides: “Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, the Corporation * * * May sue and be sued in its corporate name.” 16 U.S.C.A. § 831c(b). By the section im mediately…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Posey v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Handy v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. KinzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Humphrey v. PossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Dickey v. West Boylston Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Curtis v. Alabama Elk River Dev. Agency, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Employers Ins. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API