Breeding v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Is an employee of Tennessee Valley Authority entitled to the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Alabama, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253, et seq, in case of accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment?
The Tennessee Valley Authority, a corporate governmental agency of the United States, is subject to suit only as granted by act of Congress.
The creative act provides: “Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, the Corporation * * * May sue and be sued in its corporate name.” 16 U.S.C.A. § 831c(b). By the section im mediately…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Posey v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Handy v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. KinzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Humphrey v. PossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Dickey v. West Boylston Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Curtis v. Alabama Elk River Dev. Agency, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Employers Ins. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.