Legal Opinion

Boddorff v. Publicker Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-4023PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 623 (ADEA), generally proscribes arbitrary discrimination based on age in hiring and discharging workers. Lorillard v. Pom, 434 U.S. 575, 98 S.Ct. 866, 55 L.Ed.2d 40 (1978). Claiming violations of this statute, plaintiffs instituted this action to recover for defendants’ allegedly discriminatory and willful termination of their employment. Specifically, plaintiffs assert that defendants discriminatorily terminated them because of their age and replaced them with younger…

2Cases cited135 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rosembert v. Borough of East LansdowneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Goodman v. WagnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Petrone v. City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Vuksta v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API