Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Wagner

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-3277PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Pro se complaints must be liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), and a dismissal thereof is improper unless plaintiff has alleged “no set of facts” which could establish entitlement to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45—46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). In making such a determination, courts undertake a “painstaking[ ]” effort to insure that plaintiff’s lack of familiarity with procedural and substantive law does not result in the forfeiture of a “potentially” valid…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Clemens v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Buskirk v. SeipleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. BRAMHALL v. DELSANDRODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. BREWER v. SMITHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. BUTLER v. FLOYDDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API