Goodman v. Wagner
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Pro se complaints must be liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), and a dismissal thereof is improper unless plaintiff has alleged “no set of facts” which could establish entitlement to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45—46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). In making such a determination, courts undertake a “painstaking[ ]” effort to insure that plaintiff’s lack of familiarity with procedural and substantive law does not result in the forfeiture of a “potentially” valid…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Clemens v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Buskirk v. SeipleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- BRAMHALL v. DELSANDRODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BREWER v. SMITHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BUTLER v. FLOYDDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.