Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 4, 1986No. 85-1338PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises important questions concerning the application of this Circuit’s requirement that civil rights plaintiffs plead specific facts in their complaints. Because we conclude that the district court misapplied the specificity doctrine in dismissing some of the counts in the complaint, although it did not err in dismissing others, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.

I

On July 20, 1984, nine present and former employees of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) filed a class action suit alleging that SEPTA had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Salvadore Rotolo v. The Borough of Charleroi (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Colburn v. Upper Darby TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Young v. KeohaneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Johnson v. City of Erie, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Donahue v. GavinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Flanagan v. ShivelyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API