Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Suttle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1906No. Civil No. 956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. The ease of Czarnowski v. Holland, 5 Ariz. 119, 78 Pae. 890, so far as it holds the necessity of a broker having a written contract to recover for services rendered the owner in a sale of land, was mere dicta.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. The ease of Czarnowski v. Holland, 5 Ariz. 119, 78 Pae. 890, so far as it holds the necessity of a broker having a written contract to recover for services rendered the owner in a sale of land, was mere dicta. The determination of other points not tending to the decision of the point upon which the appeal was disposed of, must be regarded as dicta, and not as the law of the case. Mulford v. Estudillo, 32 Cal. 131; Stow v.…

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of four thousand dollars which the plaintiff alleges the defendant expressly promised to pay the plaintiff for services rendered to the defendant at his special instance and request. The services, as alleged in the complaint, consisted of bringing to the notice and attention of the defendant, and in furnishing him information of the fact, that certain described mining property could be secured and purchased, and in assisting defendant to secure the right to purchase said property, and in furnishing drawings, reports, details of conditions, samples of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Carroll v. Lessee of CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Heyn v. PhilipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Pool v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herbert J. Roberts v. Norman M. Ross, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Pliler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Granow v. AdlerArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Schilling v. Moore Et Vir.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Sargent v. CrandallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API