Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 1960No. 18749PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frantz.

Sargent owned 240 acres of land in Adams County. He and Crandall entered into negotiations for the drilling and equipping of three wells on this land, the first of which was to be put in by Crandall at his expense, the other two by Crandall at Sargent’s expense.

Crandall was to furnish the motor for the well he was obligated to pay for, and Sargent to furnish motors for the other two wells. As part of the agreement, Crandall was to have the right to occupy the acreage for approximately one year, with the right to continue occupation for an additional four years. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stuht v. SweesyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Friedman v. SuttleArizona Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bulow v. Ward Terry & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Wagoner v. Mountain Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Bruce Lavalleur, P.C. v. Guarantee GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Wagoner v. Mountain Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. Evans v. Pickett Bros. FarmsUtah Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API