Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and briefed by counsel. The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court orders under review be affirmed.
' After being laid off by Giant Food LLC, appellants brought a number of claims in district court against the company and two unions that had represented appellants during their employment with Giant. The…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Waukesha v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Universal Licensing Corp. v. Paola del Lungo S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Otis J. Holloman v. Mail-Well CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Halim v. Great Gatsby's Auction Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- (HC)Sanchez v. MartinezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020