Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 15, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-2065PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
“A deposition is not a take home examination.” Greenway v. Int’l Paper Co., 144 F.R.D. 322, 325 (W.D.La.1992).
Plaintiffs are former employees of Giant Food, LLC, who were terminated from their positions in June 2012. They have filed suit against Giant and the two unions representing them, alleging that these three Defendants conspired to misrepresent the reasons for their firing and to induce them to sign disadvantageous severance agreements. In the course of lengthy and contentious discovery proceedings, a number of depositions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- A.C. Ex Rel. J.C. v. Shelby County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Pyramid Securities Limited v. Ib Resolution, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Pina v. Children's PlaceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marks v. Washington Wholesale Liquor CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Moore v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Andrade Romero v. Rbs Construction Corporation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Ashley v. McKinneyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Jackson v. Teamsters Local Union 922District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.