Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Metropolitan Utilities District v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1924No. 23745PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

This is a mandamus proceeding, instituted by Metropolitan Utilities District, as relator, to compel the respondents, the city of Omaha and the city council of said city, to levy a hydrant rental water tax against the taxable property within the city of Omaha, Nebraska, which relator claims is a statutory obligation resting upon respondents. R. B. Howell intervened as a corelator and demanded the same relief, basing his individual demand upon the additional ground that he was the owner and holder of one of the water-bonds that were issued by said city when it purchased…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Haberlan v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Redell v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gillespie v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. City of Chicago v. Manhattan Cement Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Moshier v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. RR Realty Co. v. METROPOLITAN UTIL. DIST. OF OMAHANebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co. v. WetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Thompson v. City of AlbionNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API