Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. County of Lake

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1919No. 11902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Ralph J. Dady, describing himself as attorney at law and State’s 'attorney of Lake county, Illinois, filed his petition with the Public Utilities Commission of Illinois on October 22, 1914, reciting that the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company is a public utility subject to regulation by said commission, and that the public safety required the alteration of the grade crossing of said railway at Gurnee, Illinois. The petition stated the highway at the point crossed by the railway was one of the most traveled roads in the county and had been selected by the county as a State aid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. M. & M. Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Morgan v. SchusselleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People ex rel. Burow v. BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People ex rel. County of Franklin v. County of WilliamsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Drainage Commissioners of North Fork Special Drainage District v. Commissioners of Rector Special Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. Franklin CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Meadowlands Reg. Dev. Agency v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Commerce Commission ex rel. City of Bloomington v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People Ex Rel. Sanitary District v. SchlaegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API