Legal Opinion

RR Realty Co. v. METROPOLITAN UTIL. DIST. OF OMAHA

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1969No. 37107PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

The plaintiff filed this class action challenging the constitutionality of a one-half mill levy for what is commonly referred to as the “hydrant tax” in a metropolitan water district. § 14-1026, R. R. S. 1943. It is contended that this tax statute violates Article VIII, section 1A, Constitution of Nebraska, which provides: “The state shall be prohibited from levying a property tax for state purposes.” The tax is a property tax. The district court found that the tax was levied by the state, for a state purpose, and violated the constitutional provision. The judgment held the tax void and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craig v. Board of Equalization of Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State ex rel. Metropolitan Utilities District v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Western Nebraska Technical Community College Area v. TallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rock County v. SpireNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Evans v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICT OF OMAHANebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. County of BannerNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Evans v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICT OF OMAHANebraska Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API