Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainants are holders of Class B stock. They contest the right of the defendant to amend its certificate of incorporation in the manner proposed for two reasons — first, because the corporation is without lawful power to adopt the amendment, and second, conceding the power to ■exist, the changes proposed by the amendment are nevertheless unfair, inequitable and a fraud upon the complainants, and should therefore be enjoined.
Logically the first' contention should be disposed of first, because if it be well grounded the second need not be considered.
First, then, has the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Peters v. United States Mortgage CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
- Robinson v. Pittsburgh Oil Refining Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Stevens Bros. Foundation, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Bennett v. ProppSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Cole v. National Cash Credit Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.