Legal Opinion

Boren v. Kirk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1994No. 80833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, Justice:

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant, Leah Dawn Kirk (“client”), hired appellee, Robert G. Boren (“lawyer”), to represent her in a divorce/custody/support action. The contract for employment required, and the client paid, a $750.00 retainer, which was to be credited against the hourly rate of $125.00 for the lawyer’s services. The contract also provided, among other things, that the client “will receive a detailed summary of all legal fees and costs on a monthly billing statement....” Client received her first bill five months after the contract was signed. The bill…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Miller v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Ohio Fuel Co. v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. GREEN MEADOW REALTY CO. v. GILLOCKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. GREEN MEADOW REALTY CO. v. GILLOCKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API