Boren v. Kirk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, Justice:
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellant, Leah Dawn Kirk (“client”), hired appellee, Robert G. Boren (“lawyer”), to represent her in a divorce/custody/support action. The contract for employment required, and the client paid, a $750.00 retainer, which was to be credited against the hourly rate of $125.00 for the lawyer’s services. The contract also provided, among other things, that the client “will receive a detailed summary of all legal fees and costs on a monthly billing statement....” Client received her first bill five months after the contract was signed. The bill…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Miller v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Ohio Fuel Co. v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- GREEN MEADOW REALTY CO. v. GILLOCKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- GREEN MEADOW REALTY CO. v. GILLOCKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995