Legal Opinion

Miller v. Young

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1946No. 32396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The present action was commenced by defendant in error, as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover the principal sum of $310.50 with interest and attorney fees which was the balance plaintiff alleged defendant owed him for performing 39014 hours of labor on defendant’s building under an oral contract whereby she was to pay him one dollar per hour for said labor.

Defendant answered plaintiff’s petition by denying generally the allegations of same and denying particularly that she had entered into the contract plaintiff alleged.

Upon the issues joined by these pleadings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Messick v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Brinkley v. Patton Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Dixon v. StoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Turk v. WarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Western Distributing Co. v. DiodosioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Kincaid v. Black Angus Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Moree v. MoreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API