Legal Opinion

Hughey v. Grand River Dam Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1995No. 78183, 79649PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to resolve the first-impression public-law issue whether the Grand River Dam Authority — a public entity1 — may claim the cloak of tort immunity from premises liability afforded by Oklahoma’s Recreational Land Use Act? We answer in the affirmative.

I

ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

The personal representatives [plaintiffs] of the estates of Larry Mack Glidewell and Rachel Ann Hughey [decedents] brought separate2 wrongful death actions against the Grand River Dam Authority [Authority] occasioned by an incident in which decedents drowned after their boat had struck at…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ferres v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Evers v. FSF Overlake AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Bowers v. WimberlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Howell v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API