Legal Opinion
ROMALEZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3475PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 423
(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3475 In re Hilario ROMALEZ-Alcaide, Respondent File A74 108 648 - San Diego Decided May 29, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals For purposes of determining eligibility for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 240A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (Supp. IV 1998), continuous physical presence is deemed to end at the time an alien is compelled to depart the United States under threat of the institution of deportation or removal proceedings. FOR…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anant Ram Sangeeta Ram Nazra Bibi Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jose De Jesus Tapia v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Mireles-Valdez v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Gilberto Mauel Mendez-Reyes v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Celia Morales-Morales v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.