Legal Opinion

Fleishhacker v. Portland News Publishing Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

In August, 1935, plaintiffs commenced an action against defendant to recover the sum of $46,-342.72 and interest thereon for alleged breach of contract in that defendant failed and refused to meet its obligations to assume all liabilities of the Portland Telegram under a lease entered into between it and Rose Barde et al. on December 3,1921, covering the Telegram building in the city of Portland. Plaintiffs, who were the owners of all the stock of the Portland Telegram, a corporation, were sued by the lessors, Rose Barde et al., in California, and judgment was obtained against them for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koontz v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Dillard v. Olalla Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Graham v. Coos Bay R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ford v. SchallOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. River Bros. v. C.F.T. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Beckley National Exchange Bank v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API