Howell v. Howell
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss art appeal from an order or decree of the Superior Court of Tehama County requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiff permanent alimony. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The decision rendered is, in effect, a final judgment, from which an appeal properly lies. (Sharon v. Sharon, 67 Cal. 196; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 577; California etc. R. R. Co. v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 67 Cal. 63.)
Charles G. Nagle, and W. Henry Jones, for Respondent.
An order allowing alimony is an order after judgment, which is itself subject of appeal. (Sharon v. Sharon, 79 Cal. 702.) In case of an appeal from any decision made after judgment, a bill of exceptions is the proper, and the only proper, mode of authentication. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 651; Somers v. Somers, 81 Cal. 608.)
Beatty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- California Southern Railroad v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Somers v. SomersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Berliner v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Estate of YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.