Paul v. Israel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The review of administrative determinations in employee disciplinary cases made after a hearing under Civil Service Law § 75 is limited to a consideration of whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 [1978]; Matter of Smith v Carter, 61 AD3d 982 [2009]). Here, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the respondent Westchester Medical Center that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct (see Matter of Jenkins v Israel, 83 AD3d 1068 [2011]). The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kreisler v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smith v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Jenkins v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Lumsden v. New York City Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Szczepaniak v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rabidou v. County of DutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Guidarelli v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Barthel v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Harris v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.