Szczepaniak v. City of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking *1621to annul the determination finding him guilty of disciplinary charges and terminating him from his employment as a firefighter for respondent. We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence, i.e., “such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; see CPLR 7803 [4]; see generally Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale &…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gray v. AdduciNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Paul v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Pena v. New York State Gaming CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- DENNARD, MARVIN v. CITY OF BUFFALO EXAMINING BOARD OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- MARCOTTE, PAMELA v. HOLAHAN, PAULAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Marcotte v. HolahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Marcotte v. HolahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.