Legal Opinion
Barthel v. Town of Huntington
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The standard of review of an administrative determination *815made after a trial-type hearing required by law, at which evidence is taken, is limited to considering whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Lakey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135,140 [1987]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180 [1978]; Matter of Rabidou v County of Dutchess, 94 AD3d 1004 [2012]; Matter of Paul v Israel, 90 AD3d 666 [2011]; Matter of Martin v Board of Trustees of the Vil. of Pelham Manor, 86 AD3d 645, 646 [2011]). Here, there is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Waldren v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rutkunas v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- MATTER OF ELLIS v. MahonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bocek v. LauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- German Masonic Home Corp. v. Commissioner of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bocek v. LauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- German Masonic Home Corp. v. Commissioner of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Owens v. County of DutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018