Legal Opinion
Hamann v. Park Nicollet Clinic
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 2010No. A10-658PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In this action for the recovery of wages, appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of his case for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Minn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(e). Appellant argues that the district court erred by (1) determining that his claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and unjust enrichment are time-barred; and (2) dismissing his unjust-enrichment claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS1
Appellant Arlyn Hamann, M.D., began his employment with respondent Park Ni-collet Clinic in 1974. In 1995, Park…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011