Legal Opinion

Mathis v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 2003No. 25684PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Petitioner, Robert L. Mathis (“Petitioner”), challenges his first degree burglary conviction alleging that the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to convict him. In the alternative, Petitioner argues that the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Factual/Procedural Background

Petitioner was convicted in absentia of first-degree burglary in 1990. After the jury returned with the verdict, the trial judge issued a sealed sentence. In 1995, Petitioner appeared with his attorney to have the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. FunderburkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. MuldrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API