Legal Opinion

State v. Muldrow

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 11, 2002No. 25414PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Acting Chief Justice.

Petitioner was indicted for the armed robbery of a convenience store. The trial judge denied his motion for a directed verdict. Both armed robbery and the lesser included offense of common law, or strong arm, robbery were submitted to the jury. Petitioner was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to thirty years. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Muldrow, 340 S.C. 450, 531 S.E.2d 541 (Ct.App.2000). We reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

At trial, the State produced evidence that petitioner entered the store, asked the clerk for a pack of cigarettes,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Caton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. GourdineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Till v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Van Sellner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. LandonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API