Legal Opinion

State v. Munn

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 22, 1987No. 22742PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Appellant was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. We reverse and remand.

Appellant was indicted for criminal sexual conduct in the second degree pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 16-3-653 (1976). The trial judge charged the jury, however, only on criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the second degree pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 16-3-655(3) (1976). The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to be tried only on the charges set forth in the indictment. S. C. Code Ann. § 17-19-10 (1976). The test of sufficiency of an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Montana v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. BeachumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. TaborySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Dawkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API