Legal Opinion
Southmark Prime Plus, L.P. v. Falzone
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 20, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-127-JLLPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action have alleged several violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., and the Rules promulgated thereunder, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., by the defendants. Defendants Laborers’ International Union of North America Local 210 (“Local 210”) and Buffalo Laborers’ Pension Fund (“Pension Fund”) (collectively “the movants”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) to dismiss this action for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. VigmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Arthur Lisak v. Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Skadegaard v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Farmers Bank of State of Del. v. Bell Mtg. Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Bernstein v. IDT Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- FS Photo, Inc. v. PictureVision, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Crenshaw v. AntokolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Monarch Normandy Square Partners v. Normandy Square Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Zazzali v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Sovereign Bank, F.S.B. v. Rochester Community Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.