Legal Opinion
Skadegaard v. Farrell
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-945PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This is an action arising out of the alleged sexual harassment of plaintiff, Rash-mi Skadegaard, who, after allegedly rebuffing her supervisor’s advances, claims she was the subject of a retaliatory conspiracy perpetrated by the defendants to this lawsuit. Plaintiff was, for a period of approximately two years, the first and only female staff Clinical Psychologist to be hired by her employer, the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center [ADTC], a diagnostic, treatment and custodial facility operated by the New Jersey Department of Corrections [DOC] for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Patsy Carolyn POE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnie HAYDON, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Hortencia Bohen v. City of East Chicago, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Mazie Keller v. Prince George's County Prince George's County Department of Social Services, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Volk v. ColerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.