Legal Opinion
Crenshaw v. Antokol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 20, 2003No. Civil Action 02-2215 (RMU)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Transferring the Action to the Northern District of Indiana
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se 1 plaintiff Zena Crenshaw (“the plaintiff’) brings this action alleging viola tions of federal civil conspiracy and civil rights statutes by 15 defendants: Span-gler, Jennings & Dougherty P.C. (“Span-gler”) and Rehana Adat (collectively, “the Spangler defendants”); Joan Antokol, Ralph Cohen, Bonnie Gallivan, Anita Hodgson, Ice Miller Donadio & Ryan (“Ice Miher”), Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. (“Hoffman-LaRoche”), Julie McMurray, William Wooden and Wooden & McLaughlin…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- James Cameron v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Modaressi v. VedadiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ballard v. HolinkaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Kazenercom Too v. Turan Petroleum, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Baez v. ConnellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.