Legal Opinion

State v. Holbrook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1950No. 218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

When the defendant returned to bis store, after the shooting, be remarked that “it was an accident,” but added significantly, “I can’t make nobody believe it was.” The jury took bim at his word. They did not believe it was an accident or a misadventurous shooting.

The defendant has abandoned all of bis exceptions, except those addressed to the argument of the solicitor and the court’s charge to the jury.

1. The Argument of the Solicitor: During bis argument to the jury the solicitor threw the defendant’s rifle on the floor three different times to demonstrate that it would not fire when jarred,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. HumblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API